YOU know you are getting old when you find yourself agreeing with your dad most of the time.
But, while chewing the fat with the old man the other week over the state of modern football, it was difficult not to continually nod in agreement.
“I don’t recognise it, son,” said the septuagenarian as he gulped on his mug of coffee. “I watch the game on the telly, but it’s not the game I remember.”
This is someone who knows his onions, having watched Everton and Liverpool on a weekly basis throughout his teenage years and beyond before, until the last 18 months, attending a match at least once a fortnight.
Football has transformed immensely for the better throughout that half-century, from developments in fitness, tactics and equipment to improvements in stadia that have left them light years from the often ramshackle grounds of yesteryear.
But the game itself was largely the same. Players ran around, passed the ball, headed it. Strikers shot. Goalkeepers saved. Referees officiated.
There was also tackling. That, though, is now in danger of being eradicated from the game completely as football stands on the precipice of becoming a largely non-contact sport.
Not all change is good.
Few things can motivate a crowd quite as much a crunching challenge, yet recent evidence suggests players will soon be too scared to even go near an opponent.
Witness the furore at Eastlands during the past week or so. In the Premier League game against Liverpool, Gareth Barry was sent off for two fouls that, if we are being honest, barely merited a booking between them.
Then on Sunday, Vincent Kompany was dismissed for what in the eyes of many was a fair but firm tackle on Nani, leading to Roberto Mancini’s indignation when Glen Johnson escaped censure for a similar challenge on Joleon Lescott.
Nobody wants players going round kicking each other up in the air and launching into wild, dangerous challenges.
But these are grown men. They can look after themselves.






